Do people realize that using ad hominem attacks cheapens their point? And before anyone says 'the other side does it too', that's not an excuse or justification: it merely means you're both
![Xinjiang Victims Database on X: "4 argument types denialists use exclusively (all are logical fallacies): 1) Straw man (https://t.co/2aElrALHBm), 2) Whataboutism (https://t.co/Nq9CZagVjr), 3) Ad hominem (https://t.co/5WAWZTGMnH), 4) Appeal to ignorance ... Xinjiang Victims Database on X: "4 argument types denialists use exclusively (all are logical fallacies): 1) Straw man (https://t.co/2aElrALHBm), 2) Whataboutism (https://t.co/Nq9CZagVjr), 3) Ad hominem (https://t.co/5WAWZTGMnH), 4) Appeal to ignorance ...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eiin_fzXgAUls33.png)
Xinjiang Victims Database on X: "4 argument types denialists use exclusively (all are logical fallacies): 1) Straw man (https://t.co/2aElrALHBm), 2) Whataboutism (https://t.co/Nq9CZagVjr), 3) Ad hominem (https://t.co/5WAWZTGMnH), 4) Appeal to ignorance ...
![Ad hominem fallacy on Pinterest | Some People, Facial Expressions ... | Rhetoric, Ad hominem, Critical thinking Ad hominem fallacy on Pinterest | Some People, Facial Expressions ... | Rhetoric, Ad hominem, Critical thinking](https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/25/fb/a2/25fba2c9425044d49a6e6b2a45ab30bd.jpg)
Ad hominem fallacy on Pinterest | Some People, Facial Expressions ... | Rhetoric, Ad hominem, Critical thinking
![Physiognomy \ people are wrong. Chad Hominem Interesting thesis. Bench? - You issues? complatn lat. Ignoring the argument Physiognomy \ people are wrong. Chad Hominem Interesting thesis. Bench? - You issues? complatn lat. Ignoring the argument](https://imgb.ifunny.co/images/ccb5beef8124f3be8c840dae8f1ff0bb3d0c3a58f8afeda42c3fcef8db313519_1.jpg)
Physiognomy \ people are wrong. Chad Hominem Interesting thesis. Bench? - You issues? complatn lat. Ignoring the argument
![Xinjiang Victims Database on X: "4 argument types denialists use exclusively (all are logical fallacies): 1) Straw man (https://t.co/2aElrALHBm), 2) Whataboutism (https://t.co/Nq9CZagVjr), 3) Ad hominem (https://t.co/5WAWZTGMnH), 4) Appeal to ignorance ... Xinjiang Victims Database on X: "4 argument types denialists use exclusively (all are logical fallacies): 1) Straw man (https://t.co/2aElrALHBm), 2) Whataboutism (https://t.co/Nq9CZagVjr), 3) Ad hominem (https://t.co/5WAWZTGMnH), 4) Appeal to ignorance ...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EiinSfYXsAIMoE7.png)